ВНУТРЕННЯЯ АКТИВНОСТЬ СЛАВЯНСКОЙ ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ

Научная статья
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.6.06
Выпуск: № 2 (6), 2016
PDF

Аннотация

В статье внутренняя активность славянской культуры связывается с именем, онтологической моделью лексического значения и рекуррентностью языковых циклов славянского лексико-семантического континуума. Имя рассматривается в качестве основной единицы, обеспечивающей коммуникацию в границах славянского языкового союза, онтологическая модель лексического значения славянского слова – в качестве конструктивного единства, представляющего славянскую рефлектирующую мысль.
The internal activity of the Slavic culture as an Autonomous system due to the activity of an internal lingual consciousness, which consists in the conceptualization of world’s relations in the ontological model of lexical meaning.
Within the stated model, in accordance with the concept of M.N. Janceneckoj , fixed the place of the word in the ontology language, in the various types of lexical and thematic paradigms, conveying the representation of a person about the ontology of the world. "In representation of ontological model in lexical meaning, the word appears as a classification unit, reflecting the location called phenomena (object)  in ontological picture of the material and spiritual world" [13, p. 30]. 
 
Ontological model of lexical meaning is the basis of the mental possession of  language, which was spoken in the nineteenth century H.P. Gilyarov-Platonov [3, p. 1904]. According to him, the mental possession of language summed up the modern form of existence of words and their history, it gets you closer to understanding the forms of existence and law, followed by the speech of the person, which consists of a system of sounds and associated perceptions – impressions of the soul.
 
The ontological model of lexical meaning as the underlying structure of Slavic syntax of thought reproduces the features of Slavic reflexive thoughts. According to Aristotle [1], reflexive thought, dividing and connecting, is a proposition. In Slavic culture, the reflexive thought is the result of the reactivity of individual sections of the continuum of Slavic lexico-semantic system, which is characterized by a permanent change in the length of the continuum and the replacement of some members by others, as well as the redistribution of functions.
 
The length of the continuum and its variability is specified in a particular period of development of ethnos by the procedure of conceptualization. The conceptualization is presented as the logic of the transition from the description of facts (epistemes, units of knowledge) to their generalization. In the process of conceptualizing a new concept is formed, its "manifestation" occures. In the case of the study of Slavic reflexive thoughts we must speak  about the metahistorical process of formation of word meaning as some linguistic content, inherent in Slavic language Union.
 
Metahistory requires commitment to one conception, defining the shape of the history [10]. As such conception in contemporary artistic Slavic culture we can consider the realization (materialization) of the system design philosophy of spiritual matter. The construction of matter, the properties of which are reducible to the ratio of the primary forces, is defined as the total deduction of the dynamic process. The dynamic process is based on  general and original forces of attraction and repulsion. These forces combine in lexemes which in ontological theory of the language of P. A. Florensky [12], S. N. Bulgakov [2] and A. F. Losev [7] are regarded as names. "Name" represent the most meaningful and "smart" appearance of things, thoughts thickening, in which concentrated all the problems and all the power inherent in the word.
 
Thus, the basic unit, which provides communication within the borders of the Slavic language Union, recognized the name as a sign, a symbol of the thickening, the concentration of spiritual and material substance of thing that simulate reality and lexical meaning. Pavel Florensky created his theory of the Trinity of the word, according to which, the layering, it "triple" sence similar to the device of the human body:
"Indeed, not only Scripture, but also every good word has three locating layers, and each layer may be subject to special interpretation. ... The assimilation of a reading or listening takes place simultaneously on three different floors:  as sound, together with appropriately,  as a concept, and, finally, how tremulous the idea, incessantly swaying in time and in divers manners hinting about fullness over the time. Each of these rows is generated by special spiritual activities: thinking psychological, dramatic and, as it is called sometimes, logic (we would like to think, from λόγος), or the sensualness, intellect, mind. These three spiritual functions correspond to  what Philo called reality of body, soul and spirit" [12, p. 220].Начало формыКонец формы
 
In the theory of the Trinity of the word by O. Paul Florensky develops the idea of the Trinity of the word, understood in the context of Scripture [5].
According to Kabbalistic and Alexandrian hermeneutics (mainly Philo-Jew), and every place and the word of Scripture has the meaning, first, sensory-literal, and secondly, the abstract and edifying, and, third, perfect- mystical, or mysterious [12].
 
Ontological model of the lexical meaning of the Slavic word,  reflecting in the Trinity of word the  Slavic reflexive thought and the ability to instant  conceptualization of relations, has not only "spatial" (synchronous-diachronic) scan − within the system of one of the Slavic languages, but also "temporary" (real-virtual) – within the system of several Slavic languages.
 
The latter is related to such a property of the Slavic lexical-semantic continuum as recurrence of linguistic cycles, involving the return of the lexico-semantic variants or the continuum at transition to the next stage of its deployment in one, two or more steps back. Recurrence is a necessary and indispensable condition for long-term preservation of balance in the linguistic system [8].
 
"The existence of several lexical-semantic subsystems makes possible a kind of "protective" duplication of lexical-semantic realities that prevent the violation or destruction of material composition and system of language organization " [8, p. 24]. Recurrence of Slavic language systems (Slavonic languages) forms the basis for the formation of the historical model of time.
 
In accordance with the historical model of time, according to B. A. Uspensky, semiotic status of the events (present events) due to the fact that they are considered as reasons – as they determine, accodng to our notions, on the further succession of events" [11, p. 27-28]. The formation of the historical model of time suggests a return (in the strategy design and build a new culture) to the period of close interaction between Slavic and German thesauri. According to V. V. Martynov (Martynov 1963), this interaction was continuous from V century BC to V century ad, the Probability of Slavic-Germanic lexical interpenetration of ancient times associated with the probability of the Vistula-Odrskoy localization of the urheimat of the Slavs (the Western part) that in axiological terms for Russia in the XVIII century means locating the optimum form of connection and order – "the tribe". Is the definition of The status of symbolic system  the "Russian people"  is defined in genus and species  stratification of ethnic groups and parameterization of culture
Конец формы
Specific features genus and species  stratification of ethnic groups can be used as a potential semiotic processes, or the potential possibilities for A. J. Greimas and J. Kurt (Greimas, Kurta, 1980) ideology. The political compass of Peter the great determined the two formats of ideology, two types of recurrently of Slavic language system − two repères (from FR. repère — the label, sign, reference point) around which can self-organize Russian linguistic discourse:  Germany and the land that goes to the Nord and the expectation seems to be that the land is part of America . Lexical and semantic borrowings from German culture contributed to the syntactic organization of the Slavic and Russian values, speaking (if we rely on the concept of Greimas-Kurta) as content of models, which are seen as potential possibilities of semiotic processes.
 
The attractiveness of the U.S. lincolndale zone was determined by the need of knowledge of the principles of semiotic division of collective semantic world (universe), the development of abilities to organize the values in a taxonomy, virtual in nature and belong to the level of deep semiotic structures. The specialness of America is also that it is the territory of the blending of semiotic systems of the Indo-European language Union (Romance and Germanic languages) and ancient tongues (utterances) of Indian tribes. Prospects for improving the cognitive abilities of the Russians were, therefore, in view of interaction between the inner form of the Russian language as an element of the Slavic language Union and deep form of language consciousness responsible for adequate presentation of Slavic reflexive thoughts.
 
Throughout its history of existence of Russian literary language was a singular system that performs a function the controlling mechanism that determines the semantics of the symbolic behavior of human groups, its use for sustaining their livelihoods.
 
Them. Kant once said: arguing about the nature of French, English, Spanish, Italian and German peoples that "Russia is not yet what you need for a specific notion of natural inclinations, is ready to develop" [6, p. 1504]. These were the observations of the philosopher for Russia the beginning of the XVIII century., testifying to the lack of language contents, confirming the existence of the national spirit. The national spirit of Russia may be seen as Logos, which reflects the level of understanding of the meaning of existence and its linguistic construction.

Список литературы

  • Аристотель. Категории. Порфирий / Аристотель. – М., 1939.

  • Булгаков С. Н. Философия имени / С.Н. Булгаков. – СПб, 1998.

  • Гиляров-Платонов Н. П. Экскурсия в русскую грамматику / Н. П. Гиляров-Платонов. – М., 1904.

  • Греймас А. Ж. Семиотика. Обяснительный словарь теории языка / А. Ж. Греймас, Ж. Курте // Семиотика. – М., 1980. – С. 483-550.

  • Иоффе Д. Русская религиозная критика языка и проблема имяславия (о. Павел Флоренский, о. Сергий Булгаков, А.Ф. Лосев) / Д. Иоффе // Критика и семиотика. Вып. 11. – М., 2007. – С. 109-172.

  • Кант И. Антропология с прагматической точки зрения / И. Кант // Кант И. Метафизические начала естествознания. – М., 1999. – С. 1281-1520.

  • Лосев А. Ф. Философия имени / А. Ф. Лосев // Лосев А. Ф. Бытие – имя – космос. – М., 1993. – С. 613-801.

  • Маковский М. М. Системность и асистемность в языке. Опыт исследования антиномий в лексике и семантике / М. М. Маковский. –М., 1980.

  • Мартынов В. В. Славяно-германское лексическое взаимодействие древнейшей поры / В. В. Мартынов. – Минск, 1963.

  • Тош Дж. Стремление к истине. Как овладеть мастерством историка / Дж.Тош. – М., 2000.

  • Успенский Б. А. Этюды о русской истории / Б. А. Успенский. – СПб., 2002.

  • Флоренский П. Строение слова / П. Флоренский // Священник Павел Флоренский. Сочинения : В 4-х томах. Т. 3 (1). – М., 1991. – С. 212- 230.

  • Янценецкая М. Н. Семантические вопросы словообразования: Производящее слово / М. Н. Янценецкая. – Томск, 1991.